Home / Articles / Practice Notes: Rewarding physicians for reducing spending

Practice Notes: Rewarding physicians for reducing spending

August 15, 2013

Share:

One of the most talked-about new ideas in health care is rewarding providers for reducing medical spending by giving them a share of the net cost savings. The concept is currently being tested by many payor and provider organizations across the United States. The early results are so promising that providers — including physicians — may see contracts offering this arrangement in the near future.

The demonstration projects

The shared savings payment idea has been applied mainly in primary care practice medical home programs and accountable-care-like programs. There are wide variations in the characteristics of the demonstration projects testing the new concept, regarding:

•    Patient population included: primarily commercial, but also Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care,

•    Basis of savings payments: cost savings, compared with control group, reducing complications associated with chronic conditions, compared with budget, compared with negotiated target,

•    Adjustments for patient risk: high-cost claims, stop-loss provision, services excluded, adjusted clinical groups,

•    Support for providers: training (care coordination, evidence-based medicine), data support and analysis, share best practices, tools for tracking and analyzing performance,

•    Percent of savings shared: 30% to 50%, up to 75%, average of 50%, and

•    Performance targets: quality measures, use of high-cost services (ED, hospital readmissions).
Further testing of this new payments concept is necessary to establish the most effective model and features. Most of the demo projects have been of relatively short duration; some two-thirds of them had 2010 or 2011 start dates.

Tweaking needed

A few critical issues have been identified and require resolution. A relevant sample of solid evidence will be needed to show that genuine savings have been achieved. Providers must receive tools to help them succeed, such as timely, trended performance data with targets and benchmarks. And performance measures must be aligned across multiple payors serving the same providers.

Two things are already clear: Payors are willing to cover the costs of deploying and sharing tools for measuring health care performance and cost savings. But shared savings programs must eventually include a degree of shared risks among providers and payors. For more on the government initiatives, go to http://innovations.cms.gov/initiatives/.
For more information, contact Bill Clayton at [email protected] or Darrin Spitzer at [email protected]

All content provided in this article is for informational purposes only. Matters discussed in this article are subject to change. For up-to-date information on this subject please contact a Clark Schaefer Hackett professional. Clark Schaefer Hackett will not be held responsible for any claim, loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any information within these pages or any information accessed through this site.

Guidance

Related Articles

Article

2 Min Read

The Details on GASB 97

Article

2 Min Read

Lease Accounting Standard ASC 842 Impacts on Debt Covenants and Capital Requirements

Article

2 Min Read

Federal Audit Clearinghouse Provider Changing from Census to GSA

Article

2 Min Read

Consequences of Not Being Proactive on Lease Accounting Standard ASC 842

Article

2 Min Read

Infographic: 4 Steps to Implementing the New Lease Accounting Standard

Article

2 Min Read

Maximize Your Tax Filing Preparedness & Awareness

Get in Touch.

What service are you looking for? We'll match you with an experienced advisor, who will help you find an effective and sustainable solution.
  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.