Close this search box.
Home / Articles / Construction and real estate firms may find it worthwhile to take a hike down the PATH Act

Construction and real estate firms may find it worthwhile to take a hike down the PATH Act

November 9, 2016


With the passage of the PATH Act of 2015, Congress extended or made permanent many tax benefits that were set to expire. This included extending “bonus depreciation” for qualifying property through 2019. Under the new rules, bonus depreciation is now available for the 2016 and 2017 tax years at a rate of 50%, for the 2018 tax year at 40%, and for the 2019 tax year at 30%.

Of particular interest to real estate companies, the PATH Act created a new category of property that is eligible for bonus depreciation. Effective January 1, 2016, “Qualified Improvement Property” is now eligible for bonus depreciation.

Qualified Improvement Property (“QIP”) is defined as any improvement to an interior portion of a non-residential building if such improvement is placed in service after the date the building was first placed in service. However, QIP does not include expenditures for the enlargement of a building (i.e., expansions/additions), elevators and escalators, or the internal structural framework of the building. Examples of qualifying items include flooring, ceilings, lighting, drywall, etc. While the PATH Act establishes QIP as being eligible for bonus depreciation, it does not require a specific recovery period for tax purposes (i.e., 15 year). Therefore, taxpayers can now take bonus depreciation on QIP even if the underlying asset is considered a 39-year asset.

The new QIP rules represent an additional category of “qualifying” property, beyond the traditional rules regarding qualified leasehold improvements (“QLI”), qualified restaurant property, and qualified retail improvement property. While those traditional rules remain intact under the PATH Act, the QIP standards are far broader and allow many more expenditures to qualify for bonus depreciation. For example, qualification for QIP does not require that a lease be in place or that the building be at least 3 years old; nor does it require the landlord/tenant to be unrelated parties.  These are all requirements for QLI qualification. Prior to the PATH Act being passed, many taxpayers were required to depreciate improvements over 39 years and were not permitted to take bonus depreciation on those items, because they did not meet the qualifications for QLI (or other qualifying property).

For example, in 2014 Taxpayer A spends $500,000 to improve the interior of her facility and does not improve the elevators, escalators, or internal structural framework. Because Taxpayer A owns 100% of the building as well as 100% of the operating company using the building, she is not eligible to treat these costs as Qualified Leasehold Improvements. Therefore, the $500,000 would have to be treated as 39-year property and would not be bonus eligible (ignoring potential repair treatment and cost segregation of the $500,000). Taxpayer A would only be able to deduct 1/39th (roughly $12,820) of the cost each year over the next 39 years.

If Taxpayer A performed those same improvements in 2016, the new QIP rules would kick in and Taxpayer A would be able to deduct $250,000 in bonus depreciation in year one, plus 1/39th (roughly $6,410) of the remaining cost each year over the next 39 years. The impact on Taxpayer A’s 2016 taxable income and cash flow would be tremendous and allow her to take advantage of the time value of money.

Given this dramatic difference in tax treatment, many owners/developers are thinking strategically about new projects. Some are finding it is more advantageous to buy an existing facility and remodel it as opposed to constructing a new facility.

The example below illustrates this benefit:

Owner A builds a new facility at a cost of $5M. After performing a cost segregation study, Owner A determines the costs break down as follows:

  • 39-year – $3,750,000
  • 15-year – $500,000
  • 5-year – $750,000

Under this scenario, only the 15-year and 5-year property would be eligible for bonus depreciation because this was a newly constructed building (and therefore not eligible for QIP), and the first year depreciation would be approximately $741,827.

Owner B purchases a $1M existing facility and immediately performs $4M of improvements. After performing a cost segregation study, Owner B determines the costs break down as follows:

  • Building Purchase ($1M)
    • 39-year – $750,000
    • 15-year – $100,000
    • 5-year – $150,000
  • Building Remodel ($4M)
    • 39-year – $1,500,000
    • 39-year QIP – $1,500,000
    • 5-year – $1,000,000

All of the 15-year and 5-year property would be eligible for bonus depreciation, in addition to the 39-year QIP, so the first year depreciation deduction for Owner B would be approximately $1,524,808, more than double the first year depreciation for Owner A.

This example illustrates the dramatic impact the new QIP rules can have on a building project. By purchasing an existing facility and renovating it instead of constructing a new building, Owner B was able to double their first-year depreciation deduction and dramatically accelerate the return-on-investment for their project.

Given that bonus depreciation is available through 2019, but expires after that year, construction and real estate firms should consider the new Qualified Improvement Property rules strategically as they plan for their upcoming projects.  In addition to the traditional benefits of cost segregation, the new QIP rules reinforce the importance of having a qualified cost segregation study performed on new construction, building acquisition, and building remodel projects. As illustrated above, the benefits resulting from these studies can be substantial.

If you have questions, or if you would like further information, please contact Brendan at [email protected] or reach out to Clark Schaefer Hackett at

All content provided in this article is for informational purposes only. Matters discussed in this article are subject to change. For up-to-date information on this subject please contact a Clark Schaefer Hackett professional. Clark Schaefer Hackett will not be held responsible for any claim, loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any information within these pages or any information accessed through this site.


Related Articles


2 Min Read

2024 Tax Calendar


2 Min Read

Ohio Tax Update: H.B. 33, Biennial Budget Bill – Significant Tax Changes


2 Min Read

Should your business be outsourcing sales tax compliance?


2 Min Read

What Do the 2023 Cost-of-Living Adjustment Numbers Mean For You?


2 Min Read

New Congress: Possible Tax Legislation Changes on the Horizon


2 Min Read

Year-End Spending Package Tackles Retirement Planning and Conservation Easements

Get in Touch.

What service are you looking for? We'll match you with an experienced advisor, who will help you find an effective and sustainable solution.

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.