Home / Articles / How successfully has your nonprofit shifted from overhead to impact?

How successfully has your nonprofit shifted from overhead to impact?

October 31, 2018

Share:

In the not-so-distant past, charity watchdog groups such as GuideStar, Charity Navigator and the Better Business Bureau’s Wise Giving Alliance were notorious for giving overhead ratios significant weightings in their rankings of not-for-profits. While such a practice can help potential donors weed out spendthrift organizations, it also tends to unfairly penalize nonprofits making reasonable expenditures for current needs and strategic investments for the future.

In recent years, nonprofits have been urged to put more focus on transparency, governance, leadership and results. For many nonprofits, funders and watchdog groups, “impact” is now the primary measure of an organization’s effectiveness. If it hasn’t already, your nonprofit needs to ensure that it has made the necessary cultural changes and communicated the importance of impact to its supporters.

Possible challenges

“Impact” generally is defined as the long-term or indirect effects of measurable outcomes (such as the number or percentage of individuals served). It typically refers to broader societal change and can be much less predictable than outcomes.

Hopefully, most of your donors may now use such impact-based yardsticks as “What difference does this organization make in our community?” But. while such a shift of perspective is good news, it may mean that your nonprofit needs to make some cultural changes — including at the board level. For example, you might have to convince your board that spending more on such items as executive salaries and marketing programs will produce better outcomes and broader reach over time.

Communicating with stakeholders

Although there’s no proven relationship between overhead and a nonprofit’s effectiveness, some donors, funders and members of the public continue to use nonprofit expense ratios to compare organizations. Communicating the value of impact can be challenging.

One practical solution is to revise such publications as your annual report. Compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles requires nonprofits to report costs in one of three functional categories — program services, general and administrative, and fundraising. But there’s no reason why you can’t provide supplemental financial statements or break out administrative items to tell how they were used to enhance programs and ultimately affect lives.

Advice for change

If you’re unsure about how much your nonprofit should spend on overhead and how it can best deploy resources for meaningful impact, contact us. Times are changing — for the better — and your organization needs to change with them.  

© 2018

All content provided in this article is for informational purposes only. Matters discussed in this article are subject to change. For up-to-date information on this subject please contact a Clark Schaefer Hackett professional. Clark Schaefer Hackett will not be held responsible for any claim, loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any information within these pages or any information accessed through this site.

Guidance

Related Articles

Article

2 Min Read

The Details on GASB 97

Article

2 Min Read

Lease Accounting Standard ASC 842 Impacts on Debt Covenants and Capital Requirements

Article

2 Min Read

Federal Audit Clearinghouse Provider Changing from Census to GSA

Article

2 Min Read

Consequences of Not Being Proactive on Lease Accounting Standard ASC 842

Article

2 Min Read

Infographic: 4 Steps to Implementing the New Lease Accounting Standard

Article

2 Min Read

Maximize Your Tax Filing Preparedness & Awareness

Get in Touch.

What service are you looking for? We'll match you with an experienced advisor, who will help you find an effective and sustainable solution.
  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.